View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0004475 | Slicer4 | Extension: VMTK | public | 2017-11-18 17:50 | 2017-12-23 09:55 |
Reporter | MuddyLancer | Assigned To | pieper | ||
Priority | urgent | Severity | crash | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | reopened | ||
Product Version | Slicer 4.6.2 | ||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||
Summary | 0004475: Slicer Segmentation Crashes with One Fiducial | ||||
Description | Hi all! I'm currently using VMTK in Slicer 4.6.2 to analyze confocal z-stacks. The Vessel Filtering works great. However, when I attempt to use the segmentation with one fiducial, the application freezes and then crashes. The program works flawlessly if I identify two fiducials. I tried following the tutorial online, but it is linked to a corrupted shockwave file. | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | Have tried installing and re-installing the software. Happens with multiple files. Tried installing on different computer with different OS (Windows 10 vs Windows 7) and crash still occurs. | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Hi! I see you're using 4.6.2. As it's more than a year old and a lot of things happened since then, please try your workflow with 4.8.0. If the problem is still present, and nobody claims this ticket (I'm not sure who's responsible for VMTK), please write on discourse.slicer.org |
|
Please re-open this if you confirm after following Csaba advice. |
|
Thank you for your rapid responses! I downloaded Slicer 4.8.0 (Win 64-bit) and tried my workflow again. This time, the software doesn't crash; however, if I only place one fiducial and don't specify a stopper, it doesn't return any segmentation. If I place two fiducials, then the marching algorithm attempts to connect the two fiducials and halts once it does. From previous published papers, it appears that the algorithm can explore all interconnected vessels before stopping; my segmentation is clearly not doing this. |
|
Hmm, I'm not sure if the behavior changed in VMTK and we don't have anyone actively supporting this right now. Did you check the resources at VMTK.org? Typically if features aren't exposed (or working) in the interface we suggest people try using VMTK tools directly. |
|
Not clear that anything needs to be changed. Let us know if there's a specific bug. |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2017-11-18 17:50 | MuddyLancer | New Issue | |
2017-11-18 17:50 | MuddyLancer | Status | new => assigned |
2017-11-18 17:50 | MuddyLancer | Assigned To | => pinter |
2017-11-18 19:57 | pinter | Assigned To | pinter => |
2017-11-18 19:57 | pinter | Category | Core: Segmentation => Extension: VMTK |
2017-11-20 09:44 | pinter | Note Added: 0015412 | |
2017-11-20 10:22 | pieper | Assigned To | => pieper |
2017-11-20 10:22 | pieper | Status | assigned => closed |
2017-11-20 10:22 | pieper | Resolution | open => no change required |
2017-11-20 10:22 | pieper | Note Added: 0015413 | |
2017-11-22 13:30 | MuddyLancer | Status | closed => feedback |
2017-11-22 13:30 | MuddyLancer | Resolution | no change required => reopened |
2017-11-22 13:30 | MuddyLancer | Note Added: 0015436 | |
2017-11-24 12:10 | pieper | Note Added: 0015443 | |
2017-12-23 09:55 | pieper | Status | feedback => closed |
2017-12-23 09:55 | pieper | Note Added: 0015466 |