View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0003439 | Slicer4 | Core: Base Code | public | 2013-10-09 07:12 | 2018-03-02 11:07 |
Reporter | normandrobert | Assigned To | jcfr | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | major | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | Slicer 4.3.0 | ||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | Slicer 4.6.0 | |||
Summary | 0003439: Crop functionality unexpected behaviour with volume rendering v 4.3.0-2013-09-30 OsX and Linux | ||||
Description | Confirmation of undesired behaviour has been reproduced by Steve Pieper. See additional information section for that bit. I want to use Crop functionality to limit the size of a volume from which I will be making a surface model to a feature of interest only. Cropping doe not seem to limit the extent of the rendered volume. Steps to reproduce: Modules: DICOM. Load volume data from local DICOM database (previously pulled from a server) Modules: Volume Rendering. Module now shows 2 volumes as expected. Go to original module and make it invisible. Go to new volume created as a result of cropping and make that one visible. Toggle Crop option and watch region outside the ROI appear/disappear. I expected data outside the ROI to be gone in the new volume. The data is gone in the RYG views as expected. | ||||
Additional Information | From Steve Pieper reply: Yes, I can replicate the issues you reported - thanks for letting us know. It does seem to be an interaction between CropVolume and Volume Rendering because as Andrey reports I don't see the same effect when either is used alone. Could you file a mantis report? [1]. Andriy Fedorov could not reproduce the problem but the step he used were different: Can you reproduce the I was able to do the following: 1) load MRHead from "Sample data" I was not able to reproduce the crash. AF | ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
We were able to reproduce the problem. This would be nice to fix - but we think it's low priority right now. Let Thanks |
|
As indicated in [1], closing because unable to reproduce the problem. |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2013-10-09 07:12 | normandrobert | New Issue | |
2013-10-09 07:12 | normandrobert | Status | new => assigned |
2013-10-09 07:12 | normandrobert | Assigned To | => jcfr |
2014-03-07 05:40 | jcfr | Note Added: 0011318 | |
2014-03-07 05:40 | jcfr | Status | assigned => acknowledged |
2016-06-14 15:42 | jcfr | Relationship added | duplicate of 0002864 |
2016-06-14 15:44 | jcfr | Note Added: 0013971 | |
2016-06-14 15:44 | jcfr | Status | acknowledged => resolved |
2016-06-14 15:44 | jcfr | Fixed in Version | => Slicer 4.6.0 |
2016-06-14 15:44 | jcfr | Resolution | open => fixed |
2018-03-02 11:07 | jcfr | Status | resolved => closed |