View Issue Details
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0002400 | Slicer4 | Core: MRML | public | 2012-08-14 12:24 | 2018-03-02 11:06 |
Reporter | lassoan | Assigned To | alexy | ||
Priority | normal | Severity | text | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | fixed | ||
Product Version | |||||
Target Version | Slicer 4.5.0-1 | Fixed in Version | Slicer 4.5.0-1 | ||
Summary | 0002400: Rename the "Create and rename new Node" command to "Create new Node as..." | ||||
Description | In node selectors on the module UI the following options are available for output nodes ("Node" can be Volume, Transform, etc.):
The name of the recently added "Create and rename new Node" is quite bad due to several reasons: it's too long (5 words!), it contains two verbs (a command very rarely contains more verbs, because it's confusing), and it does not follow the usual naming convention of other software (in any Windows program this option would be called "Create new Node as..." - similarly to "Save" -> "Save as..."). "Create new Node as..." (Create new Volume as..., Create new Transform as...) seem to be a much better option:
| ||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Moving to 4.4 due to a documentation change effect. |
|
Would require fixing all the documentation and corresponding screen captures. |
|
At the bug review session it wasn't clear that the suggested wording is actually better. Including 'rename' is very specific where 'as' is not specific. |
|
Rename is specific, but actually no rename is performed (a new object is created with the requested name), so it is wrong. But the main problem is that we introduce a new wording for a very widely used concept. Open any software application (really, any) and you'll see that when you create an object with a new name the "[verb] as" pattern is used (e.g., "Save as..."). |
|
"Create and name..." would seem to be the correct wording then. |
|
For me "Create and name Node" and "Create and rename Node" are quite similar. Name is 2 letters shorter, so that's an improvement, but still sounds very unfamiliar. Have you seen "[verb] and name..." used in other software? We should involve more people in the discussion. |
|
Since there is no consensus and it may need more discussions, re-targeting to 4.5 |
|
This has been fixed in r24350 See http://viewvc.slicer.org/viewvc.cgi/Slicer4?view=revision&revision=24350 |
|
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
---|---|---|---|
2012-08-14 12:24 | lassoan | New Issue | |
2012-08-14 12:24 | lassoan | Status | new => assigned |
2012-08-14 12:24 | lassoan | Assigned To | => alexy |
2012-08-22 05:56 | jcfr | Target Version | => Slicer 4.3.0 |
2013-08-06 10:16 | alexy | Note Added: 0009410 | |
2013-08-06 10:16 | alexy | Target Version | Slicer 4.3.0 => Slicer 4.4.0 |
2014-03-07 06:45 | pieper | Note Added: 0011338 | |
2014-03-07 06:47 | pieper | Relationship added | related to 0002466 |
2014-03-07 06:48 | pieper | Note Added: 0011339 | |
2014-03-07 07:06 | lassoan | Note Added: 0011341 | |
2014-03-07 08:37 | pieper | Note Added: 0011345 | |
2014-03-07 09:16 | lassoan | Note Added: 0011354 | |
2014-04-11 08:16 | alexy | Note Added: 0011574 | |
2014-04-11 08:16 | alexy | Target Version | Slicer 4.4.0 => Slicer 4.5.0-1 |
2015-06-19 14:44 | jcfr | Note Added: 0013142 | |
2015-06-19 14:44 | jcfr | Status | assigned => resolved |
2015-06-19 14:44 | jcfr | Fixed in Version | => Slicer 4.4.1 |
2015-06-19 14:44 | jcfr | Resolution | open => fixed |
2015-09-09 08:29 | jcfr | Fixed in Version | Slicer 4.4.1 => Slicer 4.5.0-1 |
2018-03-02 11:06 | jcfr | Status | resolved => closed |