How *Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker* Rewrote the Saga’s Legacy

Published

Table of Contents

The final chapter of the Skywalker saga arrived with a whirlwind of anticipation, backlash, and existential questions about Star Wars itself. Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019) was not just a movie—it was a seismic event, a culmination of decades of mythmaking, and a bold (if controversial) attempt to tie loose ends in a galaxy far, far away. From its rushed production timeline to its divisive storytelling choices, the film forced fans to confront uncomfortable truths: Could a sequel trilogy truly honor the legacy of A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Back? Did it matter that the answer was a resounding no for some, while others saw redemption in its ambition?

The film’s release marked the end of an era, one where the original trilogy’s moral clarity clashed with the sequels’ darker, more ambiguous tones. Rey’s journey from scavenger to Skywalker heir, Kylo Ren’s tragic arc, and Palpatine’s resurrection from the void—each element was met with either fervent defense or scathing criticism. Yet, for all its flaws, The Rise of Skywalker remains a fascinating case study in franchise storytelling, proving that even in failure, there are lessons to be learned. The film’s legacy isn’t just about its box office numbers or Rotten Tomatoes score; it’s about how it reshaped the conversation around legacy media, fan expectations, and the very nature of closure in blockbuster cinema.

What followed was a cultural reckoning. Memes, think pieces, and late-night monologues dissected every frame, every line, and every supposed Easter egg. The film’s rushed production—born from Lucasfilm’s desire to deliver a trilogy in seven years—left visible seams, from the CGI-heavy lightsabers to the abrupt tonal shifts. Yet, beneath the criticism lay a deeper question: Was The Rise of Skywalker doomed from the start, or was it a victim of its own era’s demands for instant gratification? The answer lies in understanding its place not just as a standalone film, but as the inevitable conclusion to a saga that had been evolving for 40 years.

star wars: the rise of skywalker

The Complete Overview of Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019) closed the Skywalker saga with a narrative gambit that divided audiences as sharply as the galaxy itself. Directed by J.J. Abrams—who also helmed The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi—the film leaned into the sequels’ darker themes while attempting to deliver the emotional payoff fans had waited decades for. Rey’s lineage as a Skywalker, Kylo Ren’s redemption, and the return of Emperor Palpatine from the depths of the Rogue One finale were all executed with high stakes, though not without controversy. The film’s marketing promised a "new hope" for the Skywalker name, but its execution left many questioning whether the saga’s legacy had been more about spectacle than substance.

At its core, The Rise of Skywalker was a film caught between two worlds: the mythic grandeur of the original trilogy and the modern audience’s demand for complexity. Rey’s arc, in particular, became a lightning rod for debate. Was she a worthy successor to Luke and Leia? Did her sudden mastery of the Force feel earned, or was it a narrative shortcut? The film’s reliance on Palpatine’s resurrection—hinted at in The Last Jedi’s infamous "From a certain point of view" line—sparked discussions about retcons, continuity, and whether the prequels’ legacy could ever be fully reconciled. For better or worse, the film forced Star Wars to confront its own contradictions, making it as much a meta-commentary on franchise storytelling as it was a sci-fi epic.

Historical Background and Evolution

The seeds of The Rise of Skywalker were sown long before its release. When Disney acquired Lucasfilm in 2012, the plan was to expand the Star Wars universe with new trilogies, standalone films, and television series. The Force Awakens (2015) successfully revived the franchise’s box office dominance, but The Last Jedi (2017) polarized fans with its subversion of expectations. By the time The Rise of Skywalker entered production, the pressure was immense: deliver a satisfying conclusion to the Skywalker story while respecting the sequels’ darker tone. The result was a film that felt both rushed and overstuffed, a product of its accelerated timeline.

The film’s development was further complicated by the death of Carrie Fisher in December 2016, which forced the production to rethink Leia’s role. Her absence left a void that The Rise of Skywalker struggled to fill, particularly in Rey’s relationship with the Skywalker legacy. The decision to bring back Palpatine—via a controversial CGI resurrection—was a last-minute narrative pivot, one that some argue saved the film from feeling like an anticlimax. Yet, the film’s reliance on Rogue One’s ending (Palpatine’s death) and The Last Jedi’s hints (his lingering presence) created a sense of narrative whiplash. The film’s evolution wasn’t just about plot; it was about Star Wars itself evolving, or at least attempting to, in an era where fan expectations had never been higher.

Core Mechanisms: How It Works

Narratively, The Rise of Skywalker operates on two primary levels: the personal and the mythic. On a personal level, it’s the story of Rey’s struggle to define her own identity outside the Skywalker name, only to ultimately embrace it. Kylo Ren’s arc, meanwhile, is a tragic meditation on redemption, with Ben Solo’s final moments echoing Anakin’s fall and rise. The film’s mythic layer, however, is where things get complicated. Palpatine’s return isn’t just a plot device; it’s a meta-commentary on the cyclical nature of power in the Star Wars universe. His resurrection forces the heroes to confront the idea that evil isn’t just a person—it’s a system, a legacy, and a force that can never truly be destroyed.

Visually and thematically, the film leans into the sequels’ darker aesthetic, with dimly lit corridors, industrial landscapes, and a sense of impending doom. The battle on Exegol, where the Resistance faces Palpatine’s army of clones, is a direct homage to A New Hope’s Death Star battle, but with a modern twist: the stakes aren’t just about destroying a planet-killing weapon, but about breaking the cycle of tyranny. The film’s use of the Force is also noteworthy—Rey’s powers feel more intuitive than Luke’s, suggesting a shift in how the Force is understood across generations. Yet, for all its thematic ambition, the film’s pacing often feels uneven, with some scenes (like Rey’s training montage) feeling like filler, while others (like Kylo’s final confrontation) land with emotional weight.

Key Benefits and Crucial Impact

Despite its flaws, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker left an indelible mark on the franchise. It delivered the closure many fans craved, even if that closure wasn’t universally satisfying. The film’s box office success ($1.07 billion worldwide) proved that Star Wars still had global appeal, while its cultural impact sparked conversations about legacy media, fan service, and the ethics of retcons. For better or worse, it forced the franchise to confront its own contradictions, setting the stage for future stories that could move beyond the Skywalker name.

The film’s most enduring contribution may be its willingness to embrace ambiguity. Rey’s refusal to take the Skywalker name, Kylo’s final act of defiance, and the Resistance’s victory over Palpatine’s empire all suggest that the Star Wars universe is bigger than any single family. It’s a message that resonates in an era where franchises are increasingly fragmented across films, TV, and games. The Rise of Skywalker wasn’t perfect, but it was a necessary step in the evolution of Star Wars—one that paved the way for new stories to emerge.

"Sometimes the past can be a prison. Sometimes it can be a cage. But sometimes, it can be a place where you find yourself."
— Rey Skywalker, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

Major Advantages

  • Narrative Closure for the Skywalker Saga: Despite its controversies, the film provided a definitive end to the Skywalker family’s story, tying together loose ends from The Force Awakens, The Last Jedi, and even the prequels.
  • Emotional Payoff for Key Characters: Kylo Ren’s redemption and Rey’s journey to self-acceptance delivered the emotional beats fans had been waiting for, even if the execution was uneven.
  • Visual and Thematic Cohesion with the Sequels: The film maintained the darker, grittier tone of The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi, avoiding the lighter, more whimsical feel of the original trilogy’s later entries.
  • Cultural Conversation Starter: The film’s divisive reception sparked debates about franchise storytelling, fan expectations, and the ethics of retcons, making it a defining moment in modern cinema.
  • Box Office and Merchandising Success: With over $1 billion in global gross, the film cemented Star Wars’ place as a cultural and commercial juggernaut, ensuring its impact would extend beyond the theater.

star wars: the rise of skywalker - Ilustrasi 2

Comparative Analysis

Aspect The Rise of Skywalker vs. Original Trilogy
Tone and Themes The Rise of Skywalker leans into darkness, tragedy, and systemic evil (Palpatine’s return), while the original trilogy balances hope with moral ambiguity (e.g., Han’s redemption, Lando’s betrayal).
Character Arcs Rey’s arc mirrors Luke’s in some ways (self-doubt, legacy), but her journey is more about self-acceptance than mentorship. Kylo Ren’s arc is a direct parallel to Anakin’s, but with a focus on redemption over fall.
Villain Dynamics Palpatine’s return in The Rise of Skywalker is a narrative gamble, whereas the original trilogy’s villains (Vader, the Empire) are more grounded in world-building and personal stakes.
Fan Reception The original trilogy was universally praised for its storytelling and emotional impact; The Rise of Skywalker was divisive, with praise for its ambition but criticism for its pacing and retcons.
The aftermath of The Rise of Skywalker has set the stage for Star Wars’ next chapter. With the Skywalker saga concluded, the franchise is free to explore new stories, characters, and worlds. The success of The Mandalorian and Ahsoka has proven that Star Wars can thrive outside the Skywalker name, and future projects—like Andor and upcoming films—will likely focus on standalone narratives rather than direct sequels. The lessons from The Rise of Skywalker’s reception will also shape how Disney handles fan expectations, balancing nostalgia with innovation.

One trend to watch is the increasing integration of Star Wars’ live-action and animated universes. With The Book of Boba Fett and Skeleton Crew expanding the lore, the franchise is becoming more interconnected than ever. Additionally, the rise of streaming platforms means Star Wars content will be more accessible, allowing for serialized storytelling that can evolve over time. The future of Star Wars isn’t just about new films—it’s about creating a living, breathing galaxy where every story matters, regardless of its connection to the Skywalkers.

star wars: the rise of skywalker - Ilustrasi 3

Conclusion

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker was a film of contradictions: ambitious yet rushed, divisive yet necessary, flawed yet influential. It delivered what many fans wanted—a definitive end to the Skywalker saga—but not without controversy. The film’s legacy isn’t just about its narrative choices; it’s about how it forced Star Wars to confront its own identity in an era of franchise fatigue. For all its mistakes, The Rise of Skywalker proved that Star Wars could still surprise, challenge, and inspire, even when it failed to satisfy everyone.

As the franchise moves forward, the lessons from The Rise of Skywalker will be critical. The Skywalker saga may be over, but the Star Wars universe is far from exhausted. Future stories will need to balance nostalgia with fresh ideas, fan service with innovation, and legacy with originality. Whether they succeed or fail, one thing is certain: Star Wars will continue to evolve, just as the galaxy itself never stops changing.

Comprehensive FAQs

Q: Was The Rise of Skywalker always intended to bring back Palpatine?

A: No. The idea of Palpatine’s return was a last-minute addition after The Last Jedi’s "From a certain point of view" line hinted at his lingering presence. The filmmakers initially planned a different ending but pivoted due to fan demand and the need for a stronger villain.

Q: Why did Rey refuse to take the Skywalker name?

A: Rey’s rejection of the Skywalker name was a deliberate narrative choice to emphasize her individuality. The filmmakers wanted to subvert expectations that she would simply inherit Luke and Leia’s legacy, instead framing her success as her own.

Q: How did Carrie Fisher’s death affect The Rise of Skywalker?

A: Fisher’s passing in December 2016 forced the production to rework Leia’s role. Her absence left a void in Rey’s story, particularly in their mother-daughter dynamic. The film’s emotional core—Rey’s search for belonging—was deeply impacted by this loss.

Q: Did The Rise of Skywalker fix the sequels’ continuity errors?

A: Not entirely. While the film addressed some inconsistencies (like Rey’s parents), it also introduced new ones (Palpatine’s resurrection, the timeline of events). The result was a mixed bag—some issues were resolved, while others were retconned in ways that frustrated long-time fans.

Q: What was the biggest criticism of The Rise of Skywalker?

A: The film’s biggest critique was its rushed production and overstuffed plot. Many fans felt the story was trying to do too much—tying up multiple sequels, introducing new villains, and delivering emotional payoffs—all in one film, leading to pacing issues and underdeveloped character moments.